Submitted by Fred W. (not verified) on Mon, 11/29/1999 - 8:00pm.
You forgot to mention the number one reason:
Pure HTML makes for better promotional viability. When a WYSIWIG editor doesn't get things perfect (which is, uh, always), it inevitably throws in superfluous code to cover it's tracks. Which is why you see things like:
</P></P></P></P></P>
Not only does this weigh down the page's filesize (and slow down the loading process, as you've mentioned), but it also dilutes the valid content and creates a tangle for SE spiders. Certainly something to consider.
Great article, though. Obviously, I agree. Pure HTML rules!
You forgot to mention the number one reason:
Pure HTML makes for better promotional viability. When a WYSIWIG editor doesn't get things perfect (which is, uh, always), it inevitably throws in superfluous code to cover it's tracks. Which is why you see things like:
</P></P></P></P></P>
Not only does this weigh down the page's filesize (and slow down the loading process, as you've mentioned), but it also dilutes the valid content and creates a tangle for SE spiders. Certainly something to consider.
Great article, though. Obviously, I agree. Pure HTML rules!